Remember 'Question Authority'? It was a good idea 30 years ago and still is. 

DISCLAIMER:  I a not a physician nor a medical practitioner. These articles are not intended to replace a doctor's advice or your medical advisors. You are responsible for all of the research that you perform - even at my provocation - and the decisions that you make accordingly. 

How much do you know about taking care of your body?

THAT IS NOT TRUE WITH VACCINES!  THEY ARE ADMINISTERED TO EACH AND EVERY PERSON, EACH AND EVERY CHILD, EACH AND EVERY NEWBORN WITH NO CHECKS AND BALANCES IN PLACE TO DETERMINE IF THE SHOT WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECIPIENT.

HAVE YOU NOTICED THAT?

HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED WHY 30 YEARS AGO AUTISM WAS UNHEARD OF, BEING PERHAPS THE AFFLICTION OF ONE IN EVERY 3,000 CHILDREN AND NOW AUTISM IS  FOUND IN ONE OUT OF EVERY 150 CHILDREN?? 

THIS IS UNCONSCIONABLE! 

IT IS A BLIGHT OF HISTORIC PROPORTIONS AGAINST OUR MEDICAL AUTHORITIES WHOSE PREMISE IS SUPPOSED TO BE:   FIRST DO NO HARM!

YES, I saw the recent court case [February 2009] heralded as exonerating vaccines, particularly the MMR in the case of it's alleged guilt in precipitating autism.  Funny, the whole premise of the case appears to have been NOT whether the shot itself was the catalyst - but the only challenge was to 'THIMEROSAL', one of the preservative ingredients in the shot  

The case decided that this ingredient was not to blame.  But the damage is unexplained.

OK isn't that just a court case where the thief in my office had her attorney build a case around whether or not I actually gave her the 'authority' to sign my name to checks.  SOMEHOW the prosecuting attorney NEVER asked her a simple question:  'Ms. Patel', if in fact it is true that Ms. Bingham authorized you to forge her signature on checks', why did you ONLY ever use this authority to sign checks over to yourself?'   It was a case that this attorney never intended to win.

It's amazing how we can determine the outcome of a case simply by NOT asking the RIGHT questions!   IN THIS CASE, IF Thimerosal is NOT the 100% culprit, could it possibly be a result of the combination of THREE vaccines in ONE shot, with preservatives including the most toxic metals known to man such as ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE, MERCURY  AND FORMALDEHYDE all being introduced directly into the bloodstream of an infant, without a moments check to determine if this DRUG administration is in any way contraindicated in this individual by a test or two!>>???

AGAIN, IT IS THE BLANKET ADMINISTRATION ACROSS THE BOARD TO ALL CHILDREN, INFANTS AND ADULTS, WITH NO PRIOR TESTING TO DETERMINE THE POTENTIAL FOR HARM THAT SHOULD ARREST OUR ATTENTION.  NO OTHER MEDICATION ON EARTH COMES WITHOUT A PAGE OR TWO OF WARNINGS IN THE MEDICAL TEXTBOOKS AND A QUESTION OR TWO FROM THE DOCTOR TO DETERMINE IF FOR ANY REASON YOU SHOULD NOT TAKE THE MEDICATION.  WHY NOT VACCINES?

SAME THING HERE,  THIMEROSAL or not, the fact remains that thousands of children who were developing normally and already talking at 2 years of age, have gone for their MMR and come away disabled.  I have a client whose perfectly healthy, normally developing 2 1/2 year old daughter received her MMR and went catatonic immediately, never came out of it and is still severely autistic 10 years later.  CAUSE AND EFFECT.  Why is it that science puts so much credence to that until it proves a point that fails to support their goals??

 WHEN THEY DO HARM AT ALL, VACCINES HARM SOME CHILDREN FOR A LIFETIME, AND SOMETIMES THEY MAIM OR KILL!  YET THEIR BENEFIT IS QUESTIONABLE.   Ask people who get the flu each year if they get the flu shot?  Most will answer 'Yes'.  Do your own research.  The only people I know who get the flu annually are those who get the shot.  The LAST time I had the flu (20 years ago) was when the ARMY gave me a compulsory shot.

HOW ABOUT THE NEWEST VACCINE BY MERK, AGAINST CERVICAL CANCER. DID YOU KNOW THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A VACCINE THAT WILL PREVENT CANCER?  THE ONLY THING THIS VACCINE CAN DO IS SUPPOSEDLY HELP PREVENT A VENEREAL DISEASE THAT IS ALLEGED TO LEAD TO CANCER IN SOME CASES.  SO THEY WANT TO INNOCULATE 6 YEAR OLD GIRLS AGAINST A DISEASE THAT IS SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED, BY INDISCRIMINATE SEXUAL ACTIVITY OR DRUG USE.  IS THAT THE ONLY WAY THAT WE THINK WE CAN HELP YOUNG GIRLS TO PREVENT A STD?  ESPECIALLY WHEN THE VACCINE IS UNDERTESTED AND HAS LED TO PARALYSIS AND DEATH IN SOME CHILDREN?

Consider the most vulnerable of all the medical world's patients.. ..children.

VACCINES: I will start by providing a link to an article that I believe everyone who is a parent should read.  It is called 'In the Wake of Vaccines' By Barbara Loe Fisher. http://www.mothering.com/articles/growing_child/vaccines/wake.html    ..................    Don't miss reading it through to the end. 

Then check the links [above right] to learn more about the chemical content of individual vaccines.  From there it is easy to Google the ingredients and to learn how these chemicals affect the health of your child, or if its a flu vaccine, how they may be affecting you! [I read an article 14 years ago in the New York Times, quoting information from a study first published by the medical journal, the Lancet, about possible correlations between the annual flu shot and Alzheimer's disease.]

I was fortunate.  When I was pregnant with my son, I was led by providence to information which persuaded me to refuse vaccinating my newborn. Since that time my son Nikolai has only ever been vaccinated against potentially fatal diseases such as Polio & Tetanus. [School requirements have never been a problem since there are laws in each state which allow for religious exemptions from vaccines.]  Today, Nick is a thriving, healthy 8 year old who is in Gifted Talented classes at school, has no allergies, no ailments and rarely gets sick.  I can count on one hand his illnesses in 8 years. That includes zero ear infections, two colds, and two routine childhood sicknesses.  He's had maybe 5 bouts of illness in his entire 8 years.  All short lived. On the other hand, I have friends and clients whose children have been severely afflicted by the administration of vaccines. One client of mine, an attorney, is writing a book about mercury poisoning, the result of research she has done since her formerly very healthy  -then 2 1/2 year old - became ill immediately after a round of routine vaccinations.  The child, now 12, is severely autistic.

I implore you to read the article [link above] and begin your own research if you have never done so. Especially if you or someone you know is going to have a baby, or has an infant  or young child already.

NEWBORN VACCINE:  Why should you do your own research?  Well a quick review of the 2 links offered above left, will show you a powerful case in point.  In the Vaccine Excipient Summary [found at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf ] you will learn that Aluminum Hydroxide is one of the ingredients in the Hepatitis B vaccine.  Consider that Hep B is routinely administered to newborns.  Then read the definition of Aluminum Hydroxide below [taken from the 'physician reviewed web site www.drugs.com]

Aluminum Hydroxide   'It is not known whether aluminum hydroxide will harm an unborn baby. Do not take this medication without first talking to your doctor if you are pregnant.  It is not known whether aluminum hydroxide will harm an nursing baby. Do not take this medication without first talking to your doctor if you are breast-feeding a baby.'

So, what we are finding here with a bit of simple research is that - a medication that is not recommended for a pregnant or nursing mother, due to the question of harm to an infant, is contained nevertheless in a medication injected directly into the bloodstream of a newborn baby !

HEP - B is injected automatically into newborn infants in hospitals today.   Is it a law?   I was able to refuse it for my newborn.  When a mother is giving birth, unless they already have hepatitis, or are a intravenous drug user, the newborn is NOT at risk!   I'm 51 and have never had hepatitis.  SO what is this blanket inoculation of newborns for - when the risk of the disease is negligible but the danger of harm from the chemicals in the injection is legitimate?  ?Could the provocation be pecuniary? You Decide.

AUTISM and CHRONIC DISEASE:  Consider the astronomical growth of chronic disease in children in just the last 20 years.   In the 1980s one child in 2,500 had autism.  Today it is one child out of 150!  There is nothing that can possibly explain the explosive growth of this and other chronic diseases in children who live in a country with the clean air and water and plentitude of healthy food that we enjoy, outside of the concurrent explosive rate of new vaccinations in the same 20 + years.  This catastrophe is not related to income levels either, with an equivalent number of afflicted represented in every sphere of society. Rather the quantity of blood stream injected toxins via the vaccines that children are subjected to by the age of 6 in the United States, is mind boggling.  Is it any wonder that the bodies and minds of our nations youth are deteriorating at such a rate?  Could it be that we are at risk because we don't take the time to do our own research preferring to 'trust the experts'?

NEW VACCINE: Do you not know how it works with our lawmakers?  Consider that a little tested new vaccine has already become mandatory by LAW in parts of the United States at the behest and lobbying power of Merck, a drug making giant?  Having had no practical time frame of testing, Merck lobbied to have lawmakers on the hill make it compulsory for little girls of 6 years of age to have yet another vaccine administered before returning to school this fall. A vaccine against what is the low instance and currently remote presence of cervical cancer that is a result of sexual activity.  What does this have to do with a 6 year old?  It seems to me like Merck has been looking for yet another drug to foist on our population and the discovery of this relationship between cervical cancer [which vaccines do not prevent] and a biological element [which vaccines allegedly can interfere with] became their new golden goose..  At a cost of $85 and up per mandatory inoculation. [At this writing, young ladies have lost their use of limbs and others have died from this innoculation!]

But the very new vaccine, though it is already law in some locations, has yet to be sufficiently tested for either effectiveness or long term effects. Do you want your child to become a guinea pig for this experiment?  And if they're vaccine harmed, and even if you were to win a judgment, will that return your beloved child to normal?

THALIDOMIDE:  Are any of you old enough to remember the thalidomide scandal?  Also not sufficiently tested, this drug administered specifically to pregnant women for morning sickness in the 1950s resulted in babies born with terrible deformities.  http://www.fda.gov/cder/news/thalidomide.htm

Do you disagree?  If you've done your homework then be peaceful.  If not, you owe it to yourself and your family to learn as much as you can, and then make informed choices. That is the point here.  Informed choices.  Ignorance is inexcusable.  Especially with GOOGLE around!